One of the most interesting aspects of studying Shakespeare is that he does not contend to just one aspect of the any given problem in a drama.
Studying the variations of the concept of loyalty within his different plays will always bring a unique disposition to one particular aspect, coming from varied angles. The opposing factors of courage and strength and some of the most unique settlements that come through them have been looked into several other plays. For instance, “Romeo and Juliet” is one such play that brings that unique interaction into focus.
There are many factors involved in the variation and in “Julius Caesar” this issue has been handled through separate versions of loyalty and regard to social justice. The contest of loyalty to self as opposed to loyalty to others becomes a very prominent part of the entire play.
The ending deals with the meeting of justice and the concern for popular welfare. “Julius Caesar” is thus a play that works through the several layers of loyalty and support brought through the different aspects of clear motivation (coming from Mark Antony) to others who have opposed Caesar in favor of loyalty to their own cause. However transformation and mutation are also several causes that are seen within the play.
As the play moves there are also shifts and changes in people’s motives and actions.
All these come in context with the determination of the signs and issues that construct the whole drama. The later part of the drama does ask questions on Antony’s part and whether his drives have been motivated through dissuasion towards his own personal ambitions or in assuage to seek for personal grief while taking vengeance. In fact, Antony’s final speech has been quite in the same vein of Brutus’ rhetoric that followed Caesar’s murder.
This also shows how Antony’s mark of transformation had taken place through the course of the play. Again, in case of Cassius, the shift of loyalty and support goes towards Brutus and Titinius by the end of the play. The play, in its historical structure, is thus an observation of the changing themes and patterns of human behavior and different aspects of the tilt of loyalty and support seen with the altering phases of time.
Brutus’ pattern again lies somewhere between that of Antony and Cassius.
He is seemingly ardent at the beginning but then alters through the vicious corners of flattery. However he develops the strength of his new sense of loyalty to his new comrades and in some way acknowledges the guilt he has indulged in. In several ways he is one who drops to the bottom and then rises through self recognition.